Ça ne s'éteindra jamais

Merci hecKtör Dangüs, esq.

À n'en point douter

9-11, frais comme une rose

Les 7 du Québec! Ça fait du bien d'être québécois des fois.

Thermite active trouvée par des scientifiques dans la poussière du World Trade Center, Les 7 du Québec, 14 avril 2009

L'article en question:

Harrit, N. H. & al. (2009) Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2:7-31.

Ce 5 mars dernier

De PBS Denver





Le film en question:


Merci Jerm

Un gros paquet de cochonneries

Christianne Charette est copine avec le général Dallaire. Hillary Hillary Hillary! Une femme est certainement capable d'envahir le prochain pays. Rires et rigolades.

Mare-France Bazzo et Bernard-Henri Lévy [mp3]:

J'étais décolletée jusque là; pendant l'entrevue j'étais assise de manière à montrer mes jambes, y me regardait les jambes, y me regardait les seins sans arrêt.

Pousse, mais pousse...

Merci quand même Uruk

Une dépendance intellectuelle

Aller référencer Chomsky ici sur ses opinions anti-conspirationnistes m'a redonné le goût de replonger... allez savoir.

Encore et encore

Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation, Alan Miller, 21 août 2007

via-1 NIST Admits Total Collapse Of Twin Towers Unexplainable, Paul Joseph Watson, 16 octobre 2007

La galette 9-11

Loose Change


Zeitgeist


Terrorstorm


9-11 Justice


9-11 Mysteries



Merci Yakir

Micheal Ruppert sur les jeux de guerre du 9-11

Et quelques bons points par Webster Griffin Tarpley:



Et tant qu'à faire, enfonçons le clou, de 9-11 Coincidences, une sorte de couper-coller de plusieurs sources:

Les ennemis de l'empire

1) Why were a handful of rebel fighters able to penetrate the defenses of a battle station that had the capability of destroying an entire planet and the defenses to ward off several fleets of battle ships?

2) Why did Grand Moff Tarkin refuse to deploy the station’s large fleet of TIE Fighters until it was too late? Was he acting on orders from somebody to not shoot down the rebel attack force? If so, who, and why?

3) Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?

4) Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?

5) Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?

6) How could any pilot shoot a missile into a 2 meter-wide exhaust port, let alone a pilot with no formal training, whose only claim to fame was his ability to “bullseye womprats” on Tatooine? This shot, according to one pilot, would be “impossible, even for a computer.” Yet, according to additional evidence, the pilot who allegedly fired the missile turned off his targeting computer when he was supposedly firing the shot that destroyed the Death Star. Why have these discrepancies never been investigated, let alone explained?

7) Why has there been no investigation into evidence that the droids who provided the rebels with the Death Star plans were once owned by none other than Lord Vader himself, and were found, conveniently, by the pilot who destroyed the Death Star, and who is also believed to be Lord Vader’s son? Evidence also shows that the droids were brought to one Ben Kenobi, who, records indicate, was Darth Vader’s teacher many years earlier! Are all these personal connections between the conspirators and a key figure in the Imperial government supposed to be coincidences?

8) How could a single missile destroy a battle station the size of a moon? No records, anywhere, show that any battle station or capital ship has ever been destroyed by a single missile. Furthermore, analysis of the tape of the last moments of the Death Star show numerous small explosions along its surface, prior to it exploding completely! Why does all evidence indicate that strategically placed explosives, not a single missile, is what destroyed the Death Star?

Uncomfortable Questions: Was the Death Star Attack an Inside Job?, Websurdity, 28 fevrier 2007

La mécanique interne de l'administration Bush

The year before Mr. Kerik’s nomination to the cabinet, he was dispatched by the president to take charge of training the Iraqi police — and completely failed at that mission. As Rajiv Chandrasekaran recounts in his invaluable chronicle of Green Zone shenanigans, “Imperial Life in the Emerald City,” Mr. Kerik slept all day and held only two staff meetings, one upon arrival and one for the benefit of a Times reporter doing a profile. Rather than train Iraqi police, Mr. Kerik gave upbeat McCain-esque appraisals of the dandy shopping in Baghdad’s markets.

[...]

The cancer on the Bush White House connects and contaminates all its organs. It’s no surprise that one United States attorney fired without plausible cause by the Gonzales Justice Department, Carol Lam, was in hot pursuit of defense contractors with administration connections. Or that another crony brought by Mr. Wolfowitz to the World Bank was caught asking the Air Force secretary to secure a job for her brother at a defense contractor while she was overseeing aspects of the Air Force budget at the White House. A government with values this sleazy couldn’t possibly win a war.

Iraq Is the Ultimate Aphrodisiac, Frank Rich, 22 avril 2007

In just the last three years, Mr. Kerik, 49, made millions of dollars, mainly through his partnership in a security consulting firm headed by Mr. Giuliani and by serving on the board of a stun-gun manufacturer that has been seeking to do business with Homeland Security. Most recently, Mr. Kerik sold $5.8 million of stock in the stun-gun company.

Kerik withdraws as Bush's nominee for security post, NY Times, 11 décembre 2004

Mario Roy est mort c'est sûr

But it was the release of the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004 that breathed full life into the 9/11 Truth Movement — because it was now apparent to many that the "official story" relied on massive distortion and evasion.

The most dramatically disputed aspect of 9/11 is the question of what the world really saw that day in New York City, when three steel-frame high-rises — the 110-storey Twin Towers and the 47-storey WTC 7 — collapsed at near free-fall speed neatly into their own footprints.

Scholars debate 9/11 findings, John Gleeson, 18 avril

Pendant ce temps à Winnipeg

J'espère que Mario Roy va faire une crise d'apoplexie. Du rédac-en-chef du Winnipeg Sun

With many Americans (including academics and former top U.S. government officials) now questioning even the physical facts of 9/11 [...]

War on Terror looks like a fraud, John Gleeson, 13 avril 2007

Barrie Zwicker is a jew

Ça débute ici: [entrevue, google video]. Barrie Zwicker interview Chomsky dans le cadre d’une émission religieuse, 360 Vision. C'est une bonne entrevue. Puis voilà le monsieur conspirationniste du 11 septembre [strategy session, google video]. Et pan à 22:50: Noam Chomsky est un garde-barrière de la gauche (left gatekeeper), parce qu'il ne croit pas à la thèse conspirationniste, et ce tout de suite après que Zwicker eut palabré sur l'importance de ne pas crier de noms, puis d'inclure tous les points de vue, donnant l'exemple de webfairy... C'est un thème récurrent chez les conspirationnistes de tout acabit, chercher les traîtres, les infiltrateurs et les agents ennemis. Alex Jones a lui aussi Chomsky dans sa mire.

Il est clair que le mouvement conspirationniste est infiltré et larvé: le départ forcé du Pr. Steven Jones de Scholars for 9/11 Truth en fait foi; mais lancer des fatwa ne prouve pas sa droiture, peut-être est-ce même l'inverse.

Je suis en désaccord avec Chomsky au sujet du zionisme (pas sur le lobby juif, sa logique est parfaitement correcte), et je suis moi-même fort attentif aux argumentaires conspirationnistes du 11 septembre, d'autant plus que les dissidents états-uniens y ont opposé une résistance pathétique, ce dernier texte ayant aussi été publié sur ZMag, mais ça ne le rend pas moins essentiel pour autant. Scepticisme est un mot bien faible pour décrire le sentiment que j'éprouve face à ces gens qui voudrait que l'on se prive d'un tel intellect pour ... pourquoi au juste ? Pouvez pas simplement le citer et le réfuter ? Et Barrie Zwicker est un juif. Noam aussi, en passant: [FrenchConnection_5, wmv video].

David Lynch sur 9-11

via-1 Prison Planet

Le nouveau James Bond conspirationniste du 11 septembre

"When they analyzed the stock market after 9/11 the CIA discovered there had been massive shorting of airline stocks. When the stocks hit bottom on 9/12, somebody made a fortune." -M à Bond

Steve Watson ajoute:

In the film, Bond prevents the same thing happening again with the Boeing stock, by thwarting the bombing of an airbus prototype plane at Miami airport. With their prototype destroyed the company would have been near bankruptcy. Instead, someone (we later discover it's Le Chiffre) loses over a hundred million dollars betting the wrong way as Bond foils the plot.

As has been extensively reported over the past five years, multiple sources of criminal insider trading were discovered after 9/11, indicating that many different parties had prior knowledge of the attacks.

The most significant instances of this however, and ones obviously not revealed in the Bond film, are the CIA and FBI linked cases that indicate the intelligence services, at best had prior knowledge of the attacks, and at worst were involved in their orchestration.

The London Independent among others reported that the firm used to buy many of the "put" options – where a trader, in effect, bets on a share price fall – on United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by "Buzzy" Krongard, at the time the executive director of the CIA.

Until 1997, Mr Krongard was chairman of Alex Brown Inc, America's oldest investment banking firm. Alex Brown was acquired by Bankers Trust, which in turn was bought by Deutsche Bank. His last post before resigning to take his senior role in the CIA was to head Bankers Trust – Alex Brown's private client business, dealing with the accounts and investments of wealthy customers around the world.

New Bond Film Highlights 9/11 Insider Trading, InfoWars, 20 novembre 2006

Charlie Sheen sort du placard

Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story
Calls for truly independent investigation, joins growing ranks of prominent credible whistleblowers

Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | March 20 2006

Actor Charlie Sheen has joined a growing army of other highly credible public figures in questioning the official story of 9/11 and calling for a new independent investigation of the attack and the circumstances surrounding it.

Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded individuals have gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds and many more.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, the star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen elaborated on why he had problems believing the government's version of events.

Sheen agreed that the biggest conspiracy theory was put out by the government itself and prefaced his argument by quoting Theodore Roosevelt in stating, "That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

"We're not the conspiracy theorists on this particular issue," said Sheen.

"It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."

Sheen described the climate of acceptance for serious discussion about 9/11 as being far more fertile than it was a couple of years ago.

"It feels like from the people I talk to in and around my circles, it seems like the worm is turning."

Suspicious collapse of buildings

Sheen described his immediate skepticism regarding the official reason for the collapse of the twin towers and building 7 on the day of 9/11.

"I was up early and we were gonna do a pre-shoot on Spin City, the show I used to do, I was watching the news and the north tower was burning. I saw the south tower hit live, that famous wide shot where it disappears behind the building and then we see the tremendous fireball."

"There was a feeling, it just didn't look any commercial jetliner I've flown on any time in my life and then when the buildings came down later on that day I said to my brother 'call me insane, but did it sorta look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition'?"

Sheen said that most people's gut instinct, that the buildings had been deliberately imploded, was washed away by the incessant flood of the official version of events from day one.

Sheen questioned the plausibility of a fireballs traveling 110 feet down an elevator shaft and causing damage to the lobbies of the towers as seen in video footage, especially when contrasted with eyewitness accounts of bombs and explosions in the basement levels of the buildings.

Regarding building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, Sheen highlighted the use of the term "pull," a demolition industry term for pulling the outer walls of the building towards the center in an implosion, as was used by Larry Silverstein in a September 2002 PBS documentary when he said that the decision to "pull" building 7 was made before its collapse. This technique ensures the building collapses in its own footprint and can clearly be seen during the collapse of building 7 with the classic 'crimp' being visible.

The highly suspicious collapse of building 7 and the twin towers has previously been put under the spotlight by physics Professor Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories, the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the World Trade Center towers.

"The term 'pull' is as common to the demolition world as 'action and 'cut' are to the movie world," said Sheen.

Sheen referenced firefighters in the buildings who were eyewitnesses to demolition style implosions and bombs.

"This is not you or I watching the videos and speculating on what we saw, these are gentlemen inside the buildings at the very point of collapse."

"If there's a problem with building 7 then there's a problem with the whole thing," said Sheen.

Bush's behavior on 9/11

Sheen then questioned President Bush's actions on 9/11 and his location at the Booker Elementary School in Florida. Once Andy Card had whispered to Bush that America was under attack why didn't the secret service immediately whisk Bush away to a secret location?

By remaining at a location where it was publicly known the President would be before 9/11, he was not only putting his own life in danger, but the lives of hundreds of schoolchildren. That is unless the government knew for sure what the targets were beforehand and that President Bush wasn't one of them.

"It seems to me that upon the revelation of that news that the secret service would grab the President as if he was on fire and remove him from that room," said Sheen.

The question of how Bush saw the first plane hit the north tower, when no live footage of that incident was carried, an assertion that Bush repeated twice, was also put under the spotlight.

"I guess one of the perks of being President is that you get access to TV channels that don't exist in the known universe," said Sheen.

"It might lead you to believe that he'd seen similar images in some type of rehearsal as it were, I don't know."

The Pentagon incident

Sheen outlined his disbelief that the official story of what happened at the Pentagon matched the physical evidence.

"Show us this incredible maneuvering, just show it to us. Just show us how this particular plane pulled off these maneuvers. 270 degree turn at 500 miles and hour descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes, skimming across treetops the last 500 meters."

We have not been able to confirm that a large commercial airliner hit the Pentagon because the government has seized and refused to release any footage that would show the impact.

"I understand in the interest of national security that maybe not release the Pentagon cameras but what about the Sheraton, what about the gas station, what about the Department of Transportation freeway cam? What about all these shots that had this thing perfectly documented? Instead they put out five frames that they claim not to have authorized, it's really suspicious," said Sheen.

Sheen also questioned how the plane basically disappeared into the Pentagon with next to no wreckage and no indication of what happened to the wing sections.

A real investigation

Sheen joined others in calling for a revised and truly independent investigation of 9/11.

Sheen said that "September 11 wasn't the Zapruder film, it was the Zapruder film festival," and that the inquiry had to be, "headed, if this is possible, by some neutral investigative committee. What if we used retired political foreign nationals? What if we used experts that don't have any ties whatsoever to this administration?"

"It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families, we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

Charlie Sheen joins the rest of his great family and notably his father Martin Sheen, who has lambasted for opposing the Iraq war before it had begun yet has now been proven right in triplicate, in using his prominent public platform to stand for truth and justice and we applaud and salute his brave efforts, remembering Mark Twain's quote.

"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."

Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story, PrisonPlanet.com, 20 mars 2006

Huge Reaction To Sheen 9/11 Story. Linked on Drudge, later removed, PrisonPlanet.com, 21 mars 2006

Mon billet sur les travaux du Professeur Steven Jones